FOR THE DATA PROTECTION OFFICER
You are accountable for privacy. Give yourself one place to prove it.
You carry the legal weight for how the organisation handles personal data, and you influence every security and vendor decision, but the work is scattered: the ROPA in one tool, DPIAs in another, processor checks in a third, and the data flows mostly in your head. Acuna puts processing, processors, assessments, and privacy risk on one connected record, so when a regulator asks, you have a defensible answer fast, not a week of assembly.
Frameworks covered
50+ frameworks pre-loaded. Map once, reuse across every obligation.
Organization price
Every owner, analyst, and auditor included. No per-seat fees.
CH + EU data residency
Hosted in Switzerland and the EU. ISO 27001:2022 certified.
ACUNA FOR A DPO
Acuna gives a DPO a single connected system for privacy operations. It keeps the records of processing activities (ROPA) current, runs DPIAs, processor assessments, and transfer assessments from one shared record, handles data subject requests through a dedicated intake, and helps scope a breach inside the 72-hour window. Because privacy lives on the same platform as the organisation's controls, risk register, and vendor records, the answer a DPO gives a regulator is the same one the CISO gives, and the evidence is reusable across GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2. Privacy data is hosted in Switzerland.
Legally accountable, for a programme that keeps moving.
You are measured on things that are hard to keep true at once: DPIA coverage, how fast data subject requests are answered, and whether the organisation is ready when a regulator calls. Meanwhile the processing activities age out because the business does not maintain them, you run GDPR next to the Swiss FADP, the UK GDPR, and whatever sectoral or regional rules apply, and the data flow visibility you need to answer any of it lives in your head or in a diagram that is already out of date. The job is not the documentation. The job is keeping it true, and being able to show it.
The answers stop being a reconstruction.
Your ROPA stays current because it is connected to the real asset and vendor inventory, not a separate document you maintain by hand. Assessments share context, so a DPIA, a processor agreement, and a transfer assessment for the same activity draw on one record instead of three. Because privacy sits on the same platform as security and risk, the answer you give a supervisory authority is the same one your CISO gives, backed by evidence that is reusable across your other frameworks. And when a vendor incident hits, the connected record shows what is exposed before the 72-hour window closes.
Living ROPA tied to your real asset and vendor inventory, so the register reflects what is actually true, not what was true at the last manual update.
DPIAs, processor assessments, and transfer assessments drawn from one shared record, not retyped into separate wizards each time.
Privacy data, processors, and risk kept current on a cadence, so the register does not drift between audits.
Evidence reusable across GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2, so the regulator and the auditor get the same answer from the same source.
Aiko drafts DPIAs and maps records, AI assisted and human-confirmed, so your team spends time on judgment, not upkeep.
You probably know which of these you are living right now.
A DSAR just landed.
The clock is running and you do not yet know everywhere that person's data sits. With the data already mapped, you find it and respond inside the deadline rather than racing it.
A regulator inquiry is open.
You need a defensible answer fast, and it needs to match what security and compliance say. One source of truth means one answer, not two versions to reconcile.
A processor changed, or there was a breach.
The 72-hour window starts, the vendor and the data they touch are already linked, and the scope of the incident is a report, not a reconstruction.
You are running GDPR, the FADP, and more in parallel.
Each regime assumes an accurate picture of your processing. One record serves all of them, with independent legal bases and review cycles, not duplicate workspaces that drift apart.
Honestly, and without the spin.
“A privacy point tool already does this.”
Many do, at enterprise scale and enterprise price, and in their own silo. The difference here is not features; it is that privacy is connected to the controls, risk, and vendors the rest of your programme runs on, so it stays current and your evidence is reusable instead of duplicated.
“We use a law firm for this.”
A firm gives you advice. It does not give you an operating system that keeps your ROPA current, runs your assessments, and produces your evidence. You need both; this is the second one.
“Security already owns this.”
Then this is how you both work from one source of truth, so the answer you give a regulator and the answer security gives are the same answer, not two versions that have to be reconciled.
Built by people who carry the same accountability.
Acuna was built by privacy and GRC practitioners who carry the same obligations you do, not by engineers who added a privacy module later. The team brings more than 35 years of combined experience running programmes under GDPR and related frameworks, and the ROPA, DPIA, and DSAR tooling exists because those same people refused to keep doing that work in spreadsheets. Privacy data is hosted in Switzerland. Priced by programme scope, not per seat, so your full privacy and GRC team is included. The team runs its own privacy and compliance programme on Acuna.
View pricingYour frameworks, your pains, your starting point.
Your frameworks
Swiss FADP and UK GDPR are governed on the same record as GDPR. One processing activity, several frameworks, independent legal bases, no duplicate workspaces. All frameworks →
What solves your pains