AI governance

What is a fundamental rights impact assessment?

Direct answer

A fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA) is the assessment that some deployers of high-risk AI systems must carry out before first use under Article 27 of the EU AI Act. It describes how the system will be used, who it affects, the risks of harm to those people, the human oversight in place and what happens if the risks materialise.

It covers public bodies, private entities providing public services, and deployers using AI for credit scoring or life and health insurance pricing.

Who must run a FRIA

Article 27 applies to deployers of high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III, except systems for critical infrastructure, when the deployer is:

  • a body governed by public law, or a private entity providing public services, or
  • a deployer of a system that evaluates creditworthiness or sets a credit score (fraud detection excepted), or that assesses risk and sets prices for life and health insurance.

Providers do not run a FRIA. Their own duties sit in the provider obligations of the Act.

What it contains

  • The deployer’s processes in which the system will be used, in line with its intended purpose.
  • The period and frequency of use.
  • The categories of people and groups likely to be affected in that context.
  • The specific risks of harm to them, using the information the provider supplies.
  • The human oversight measures, following the instructions for use.
  • The measures to take if the risks materialise, including internal governance and complaint arrangements.

The deployer notifies the market surveillance authority of the results, using a template from the AI Office, and updates the assessment when any of these elements changes.

When it applies, and how it fits a DPIA

The FRIA is part of the high-risk obligations. After Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, those apply to standalone Annex III systems from 2 December 2027. Where a data protection impact assessment under Article 35 of the GDPR already meets some of these duties, the FRIA complements it rather than repeating it. Many deployers run both on the same system record. See when a DPIA is required.

The FRIA in Acuna GRC

In AI Governance in Acuna GRC, each AI system has its own impact assessment. Screening first records whether a full assessment is owed. The five-part wizard covers purpose and context, affected parties and harms, oversight and contestation, measures and residual risk, and review. Tick Fundamental-rights impact assessment and one extra section appears, so one record answers both. Approval freezes it, and linking the system to its processing activities in Data Privacy keeps the DPIA on the same record. See AI Governance in Acuna GRC.

How Acuna GRC handles it

In Acuna GRC the FRIA is a section of the AI impact assessment.

Sources

  1. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act), Article 27 and Annex III
  2. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI)
  3. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), Article 35

This page explains the rules in general terms and is not legal advice.

Frequently asked

Is a FRIA the same as a DPIA?

No. A DPIA under the GDPR looks at risks to people from processing personal data. A FRIA looks at the wider fundamental rights a high-risk AI system can affect, such as non-discrimination, and applies even where the data protection risk is low.

Can we reuse an earlier FRIA?

Yes, for similar cases. A deployer may rely on a FRIA it carried out before, or on an existing one from the provider, and must update it when an element has changed.

See how Acuna GRC runs this.

Tell us your frameworks and your team. We show you how Acuna GRC runs the program.

Hosted in Switzerland, the EU or the US