FOR COMPLIANCE AND RISK LEADERS
You map the same control five times. It should be once.
You run the program day to day, and right now you are the crosswalk: the same control mapped by hand into ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whatever came next. Acuna is the GRC operating system that maps it once and keeps every framework current from one place.
Frameworks covered
50+ frameworks pre-loaded. Map once, reuse across every obligation.
Organization price
Every owner, analyst, and auditor included. No per-seat fees.
CH + EU data residency
Hosted in Switzerland and the EU. ISO 27001:2022 certified.
ACUNA FOR A HEAD OF COMPLIANCE
For a Head of Compliance, Acuna is the GRC operating system that maps each control once and reuses it across every framework. Native crosswalks, continuous evidence with version history, and reviewer workflows built the way GRC teams actually run. One control library across ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIS2, DORA, and GDPR, priced by program, not per seat.
The crosswalk lives in a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet lives with you.
You map the same control into one framework, then another, then reconcile the two by hand when a clause changes. Evidence collection is a standing negotiation with the business, and when you finally get it, two teams have answered the same control three different ways. You hold the whole thing together with reminders and version notes, and then you are asked to prove the program is worth its budget, with data that is scattered across the very spreadsheets you are trying to escape. None of that is your process failing. It is what happens when the control library is a document instead of a system.
Map a control once. Satisfy every framework.
A control is mapped one time and reused across every framework through native crosswalks, so a clause change updates everywhere instead of starting a reconciliation. Evidence is collected continuously, with version history and reviewer workflows, so freshness is a state you maintain rather than a quarterly battle. Every team answers the same control the same way, because there is one source for it. And the real-time view of coverage and risk is the value story you have been trying to assemble for the board, already assembled.
One control library with native crosswalks across frameworks.
Controls have owners and live evidence, with reviewer workflows.
Evidence collection runs continuously on a cadence, not a sprint.
Coverage, findings, and the audit pack stay current as you go.
Aiko suggests mappings with confidence scoring and drafts the repetitive documentation, so analysts spend time on judgment, not data entry.
You probably know which of these you are living right now.
A due-diligence review just landed.
A customer security team wants evidence across several frameworks, and you are about to assemble it by hand. Reusable evidence answers most of it once.
You are expanding into a new market.
US, UK, or MEA adds rules in parallel with the ones you already run. New obligations map against the controls you already have, not a fresh spreadsheet.
A regulator or sectoral audit is open.
The questions cut across frameworks and teams, and the answers need to agree. One control library means one answer, not three.
You are fighting for next year's budget.
The case for the compliance function is a coverage-and-risk story you can finally show live, instead of reconstructing it from files.
Two quiet doubts, answered straight.
“My team will not move to another tool.”
Fair, because most tools are built by engineers and your team pays for it in ramp. This one was built by GRC operators, so the reviewer workflows and version history already match how they work, and the first thing it removes is the hand-maintained crosswalk, which is the work they like least.
“I am not sure I can justify the spend.”
The honest comparison is not against zero, it is against the cost you already pay in manual crosswalks, evidence sprints, and inconsistent answers. It is priced by program scope, not per seat, so it does not grow with your team, and the coverage data it gives you is the budget argument itself.
Built by people who run programs for a living.
Acuna is built and run by practitioners, with more than a hundred years of combined GRC experience across the team and the Swiss group behind it. The crosswalks, version history, and reviewer workflows exist because the people who built them have maintained programs by hand and refused to do it again. Your data stays in Switzerland and the EU. It is priced by program scope, not per seat. The team runs its own compliance program on Acuna, which is how the product gets tested.
View pricingThe frameworks on your plate, the way you run them.
Your frameworks
These are where most teams start. 50+ frameworks are pre-loaded, with full integration rolling out. Browse all →
What solves your pains